Konstantin Volzhenin, Jean-Pierre Changeux, Guillaume Dumas
Publication year: 2022


Multiple biological mechanisms support the unique ability of the brain to develop complex cognitive abilities. Nevertheless, it remains unclear which mechanisms are necessary and sufficient. We propose a neurocomputational model of the developing brain spanning sensorimotor, cognitive, and conscious levels. The model solves three tasks of increasing complexity: from visual recognition to cognitive manipulation and maintenance of conscious percepts. Results highlight two fundamental mechanisms for the multilevel development of cognitive abilities in biological neural networks: 1) synaptic epigenesis, with Hebbian learning at the local scale and reinforcement learning at the global scale; and 2) self-organized dynamics, through spontaneous activity and balanced excitatory/inhibitory ratio of neurons. We emphasize how these core features of human intelligence could guide future development in artificial intelligence.


Several neuronal mechanisms have been proposed to account for the formation of cognitive abilities through postnatal interactions with the physical and sociocultural environment. Here, we introduce a three-level computational model of information processing and acquisition of cognitive abilities. We propose minimal architectural requirements to build these levels, and how the parameters affect their performance and relationships. The first sensorimotor level handles local nonconscious processing, here during a visual classification task. The second level or cognitive level globally integrates the information from multiple local processors via long-ranged connections and synthesizes it in a global, but still nonconscious, manner. The third and cognitively highest level handles the information globally and consciously. It is based on the global neuronal workspace (GNW) theory and is referred to as the conscious level. We use the trace and delay conditioning tasks to, respectively, challenge the second and third levels. Results first highlight the necessity of epigenesis through the selection and stabilization of synapses at both local and global scales to allow the network to solve the first two tasks. At the global scale, dopamine appears necessary to properly provide credit assignment despite the temporal delay between perception and reward. At the third level, the presence of interneurons becomes necessary to maintain a self-sustained representation within the GNW in the absence of sensory input. Finally, while balanced spontaneous intrinsic activity facilitates epigenesis at both local and global scales, the balanced excitatory/inhibitory ratio increases performance. We discuss the plausibility of the model in both neurodevelopmental and artificial intelligence terms.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.